Every week, someone starts a podcast.
They buy a microphone. They book a guest. They record an episode, figure out the editing, publish it somewhere, and share the link with everyone they know.
The first few episodes feel exciting.
There is momentum. There are listeners - friends, colleagues, curious followers who show up out of goodwill and genuine interest.
And then, somewhere between episode four and episode nine, something changes.
The momentum slows.
The episodes start to feel harder to make.
The host is not sure what to talk about next.
The guests are getting less interesting or harder to book.
The audience is not growing, and the overwhelm starts to creep in.
The effort is not matching the return. And quietly, without any formal announcement, the show stops.
This is not a rare story. It is the most common story in podcasting.
More than eighty percent of podcasts do not make it past episode ten.
The medium is littered with abandoned shows - good ideas that never found their footing, talented hosts who ran out of direction, businesses that invested time and money into something that quietly disappeared before it ever found its audience.
I have spent close to twenty years in broadcasting. I have watched this pattern repeat itself more times than I can count. Truth be told, I came this close to calling it a day too.
So I can tell you with confidence that in almost every case, the drop-off had nothing to do with the audio quality, the editing, the microphone, or the host's ability to have a good conversation.
It had everything to do with the thinking that happened, or more accurately, did not happen, before the first episode was recorded.
The Mistake Most Podcasters Make
When most people decide to start a podcast, they start in one of a few places.
They start with the format:
"I'll do interviews, thirty minutes each, every two weeks."
Or they start with the guest list:
"I know some interesting people, I'll reach out and see who's available."
Or they start with the equipment:
"I need a good microphone and somewhere quiet to record."
These are not bad starting points. They are just the wrong ones.
They are production decisions being made before the strategic decisions have been addressed. And when you build on an unstated, untested foundation, the cracks appear early. Usually around episode four.
The Four Questions Actually Matter.
The work that determines whether a podcast lasts is not production work. It is strategy work. And it happens before anyone presses record.
It starts with four questions that most podcasters never ask, or ask too late, after the show has already launched in a direction that is difficult to change.
1. Who is this podcast for - specifically? Not "anyone interested in entrepreneurship" or "people who like personal development." Specifically. The more precisely you can describe the person this show is designed for, the more clearly every subsequent decision becomes. Format, tone, episode length, topic selection, guest criteria. All of these flow from a clear answer to this question. Without it, you are guessing every time you sit down to plan an episode.
2. Why should this podcast exist? There are millions podcasts. What does this one offer that the others do not? This is not a question about being completely unique. That is an unrealistic standard. It is a question about differentiation. What is the angle, the perspective, the specific value this show provides that gives a listener a genuine reason to choose it over everything else competing for their attention? If you cannot answer this clearly, neither can your potential audience.
3. What role does this podcast play in the business or the career behind it? A podcast without a purpose beyond "it seemed like a good idea" will run out of reasons to continue. For founders and business leaders specifically, a podcast needs to do something - build authority, deepen client relationships, attract talent, establish thought leadership, create content that serves the business in multiple ways. When the show is connected to a clear purpose, the decision to keep making it is easy even when it feels hard. When it is not, the first moment of difficulty becomes a reason to stop.
4. What format is sustainable over the long term? This is the question most people answer by imitation. They model their show on a podcast they admire - same structure, similar length, comparable production style - without asking whether that format fits their own capacity, resources, and communication strengths. A weekly interview show sounds appealing until you are trying to book and record twelve guests a month while running a business. The format that lasts is the one designed around what you can actually sustain, not what sounds impressive in theory.
The Sequence Problem
Here is what I have come to understand after years of working with founders, businesses, and creatives across Africa and internationally.
Most podcasts are built backwards.
The microphone comes first. The thinking comes later, if it comes at all.
And by the time the strategic gaps become visible, the show has already launched in a direction that is costly to change.
The shows that last are built differently becasue the thinking comes first.
The strategic decisions - audience, purpose, differentiation, format - are made deliberately, before recording begins. And because the foundation is clear, everything built on top of it is stronger. The host knows what the show is. The listener knows what to expect. The episodes have direction.
Some South African shows have proven this.
Podcast and podcast and chill Chill with MacG has been running for over seven years and built one of the largest audiences in African podcasting. BizNews Radio has published thousands of episodes.
These shows exist. But they are the exception, not the rule.
And what separates them from the shows that disappeared is not luck or talent. It is a combination of early adoption and the clarity of purpose that was there from the beginning. The decisions that would otherwise be made under pressure - what to talk about next, who to invite, how long to go - have already been made in principle.
This is not a complicated idea. But it is a discipline that most podcasters never apply.
What This Means in Practice
If you are thinking about starting a podcast, the most valuable investment you can make is not in equipment. It is in the thinking that precedes production.
Slow the decision-making process down. Answer the four questions honestly, with specificity, before you book your first guest or buy your first microphone. Test your answers against reality, not against what you hope is true, but against what the evidence suggests.
If you already have a podcast and it is struggling - losing momentum, growing slowly, feeling increasingly hard to sustain - the answer is almost never to produce more episodes or improve the audio quality.
The answer is to go back to the foundation and ask whether it was built clearly enough in the first place.
The good news is that it is never too late to do the strategic work.
Shows get repositioned and relaunched successfully all the time. But it is significantly easier, and less costly, to get the thinking right before you start than to rebuild after the cracks appear.
Great podcasts are not accidents.
They are not the result of talent alone, or the right guests, or a good microphone, or even a great idea. They are the result of clear thinking applied in the right order, before a single word is recorded.
That is where the work begins.
And for the 80% of podcasts that never make it to episode ten, it is highly likely this is the work that was skipped.
This is the first of 12 pieces I’ll be writing. Each month, another layer of the thinking another. I've been testing and tweaking these concepts, lessons and ideas for nearly two decades. But writing them down - properly, in a sequence - is new.
I hope you find something useful in them.
Next edition arrives on 13 May.
Sean

Was this newsletter forwarded to you by a friend?
You must be really cool! Click below to subscribe and join for free.

